DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo S40
BMWMakeVolvo
Z3ModelS40
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo S40
7,9 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
224 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
170 HPPower200 HP
210 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo S40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationVolvo S40
4050 mmLength4516 mm
1740 mmWidth1716 mm
1293 mmHeight1422 mm
1345 KgWeight1310 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…