DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 BMW Z3 vs 1995 Rover 800 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 800

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 800
BMWMakeRover
Z3Model800
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 800
9,5 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
205 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
140 HPPower180 HP
180 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 800
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 800
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 800
4025 mmLength4882 mm
1692 mmWidth1730 mm
1288 mmHeight1393 mm
1185 KgWeight1395 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2766 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 BMW Z3 and 1995 Rover 800 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 800 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…