DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Tundra vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
TundraModelExplorer
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
240 HPPower242 HP
427 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank85 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
13,8 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4 ECTGears5
245/70 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5545 mmLength4810 mm
2014 mmWidth1830 mm
1801 mmHeight1830 mm
2143 KgWeight1965 Kg
3259 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Tundra and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…