DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeRenault
Z3ModelMegane
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
118 HPPower135 HP
190 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
11 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4050 mmLength4209 mm
1740 mmWidth1777 mm
1288 mmHeight1458 mm
1220 KgWeight1240 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…