DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 6
BMWMakeMazda
Z3Model6
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 6
10,4 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
196 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
118 HPPower136 HP
190 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank64 lt
11 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda 6
4050 mmLength4700 mm
1740 mmWidth1780 mm
1288 mmHeight1480 mm
1220 KgWeight1465 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…