DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Hyundai Elantra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Elantra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeHyundai
Z3ModelElantra
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
196 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1975 cc
118 HPPower139 HP
190 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4050 mmLength4495 mm
1740 mmWidth1720 mm
1288 mmHeight1425 mm
1220 KgWeight1293 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Hyundai Elantra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Elantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…