DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 BMW Z3 vs 2002 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationMG TF
BMWMakeMG
Z3ModelTF
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationMG TF
10,4 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
196 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
118 HPPower136 HP
190 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationMG TF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
11 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationMG TF
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/45 R16; 215/40 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationMG TF
4050 mmLength3943 mm
1740 mmWidth1630 mm
1288 mmHeight1261 mm
1220 KgWeight1105 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 BMW Z3 and 2002 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…