DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 BMW Z3 vs 1998 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 400
BMWMakeRover
Z3Model400
1998Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 400
10,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
118 HPPower136 HP
190 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 400
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 400
4050 mmLength4365 mm
1740 mmWidth1680 mm
1288 mmHeight1390 mm
1220 KgWeight1210 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 BMW Z3 and 1998 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…