DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 BMW Z3 vs 1996 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
BMWMakeSaturn
Z3ModelSL
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
168 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank46 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationSaturn SL
4025 mmLength4524 mm
1692 mmWidth1687 mm
1288 mmHeight1397 mm
1160 KgWeight1058 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 BMW Z3 and 1996 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…