DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 BMW Z3 vs 1996 Lancia Dedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Dedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationLancia Dedra
BMWMakeLancia
Z3ModelDedra
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationLancia Dedra
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
194 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
115 HPPower131 HP
168 NmTorque164 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationLancia Dedra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationLancia Dedra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationLancia Dedra
4025 mmLength4343 mm
1692 mmWidth1700 mm
1288 mmHeight1430 mm
1160 KgWeight1310 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 BMW Z3 and 1996 Lancia Dedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Dedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…