DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Alfa Romeo 159 vs 2004 Mazda Atenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Atenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
159ModelAtenza
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
222 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
185 HPPower178 HP
230 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
215/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4660 mmLength4745 mm
1828 mmWidth1780 mm
1417 mmHeight1440 mm
1490 KgWeight1340 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Alfa Romeo 159 and 2004 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…