DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Toyota Tacoma vs 2013 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
TacomaModelCX-9
2015Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3955 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
236 HPPower273 HP
361 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank76 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/75 R16Tyre size245/60 R18; 245/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5286 mmLength5085-5100 mm
1834 mmWidth1935 mm
1679 mmHeight1727 mm
—Weight1964 Kg
3236 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Toyota Tacoma and 2013 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…