DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Tacoma vs 2000 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeChrysler
TacomaModelConcorde
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
182 HPPower203 HP
240 NmTorque258 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/75 R15; 235/55 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5138 mmLength5310 mm
1781 mmWidth1900 mm
1715 mmHeight1420 mm
1247 KgWeight1570 Kg
3096 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Tacoma and 2000 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…