DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Tacoma vs 2000 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
TacomaModelPathfinder
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
3Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2664 cc
150 HPPower131 HP
240 NmTorque279 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption14 lt
10,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/75 R15; 235/55 R16Tyre size235/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4530 mm
1689 mmWidth1840 mm
1549 mmHeight1750 mm
1445 KgWeight1870 Kg
2624 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Tacoma and 2000 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…