2002 • Toyota
Supra
Toyota Supra 3.0i 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2002Overall Score82.5/100
2002 Toyota Supra vs 2003 Nissan Cima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2003Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Supra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota SupraSpecificationNissan Cima
ToyotaMakeNissan
SupraModelCima
2002Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Toyota SupraSpecificationNissan Cima
5,1 s0–100 km/h—
256 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2988 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
432 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota SupraSpecificationNissan Cima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11 ltAverage consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota SupraSpecificationNissan Cima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/50 ZR16; 245/50 ZR16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota SupraSpecificationNissan Cima
4520 mmLength4970 mm
1810 mmWidth1820 mm
1275 mmHeight1450 mm
1510 KgWeight1670 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2830 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Toyota Supra and 2003 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Supra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…