DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Toyota Sprinter vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
SprinterModelCronos
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1578 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
165 HPPower140 HP
162 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4360 mmLength4695 mm
1690 mmWidth1770 mm
1490 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1170 Kg
—Wheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Toyota Sprinter and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…