DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Sparky vs 2004 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Forfour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeSmart
SparkyModelForfour
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
88 HPPower95 HP
123 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3765 mmLength3752 mm
1515 mmWidth1684 mm
1895 mmHeight1450 mm
1110 KgWeight965 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Sparky and 2004 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Forfour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…