DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Sparky vs 1999 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Sparky

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
SparkyModelProtege
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1323 cc
88 HPPower85 HP
123 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Tyre size175/70 R13

Dimensions

3765 mmLength4315 mm
1515 mmWidth1695 mm
1895 mmHeight1410 mm
1110 KgWeight1020 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Sparky and 1999 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Sparky leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…