DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Soarer vs 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Soarer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

85.5–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
SoarerModelLancer
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h4,9 s
260 km/hTop speed260 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
378 NmTorque383 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank50 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size225/45 ZR17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4350 mm
1790 mmWidth1770 mm
1350 mmHeight1415 mm
1560 KgWeight1280 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Soarer and 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Soarer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…