DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Soarer vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Soarer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

85.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota SoarerSpecificationMG ZT
ToyotaMakeMG
SoarerModelZT
2000Model year2003
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Toyota SoarerSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h6,7 s
260 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
280 HPPower260 HP
378 NmTorque410 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota SoarerSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank66 lt
14 ltUrban consumption17,9 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,4 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota SoarerSpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota SoarerSpecificationMG ZT
4860 mmLength4790 mm
1790 mmWidth1850 mm
1350 mmHeight1430 mm
1560 KgWeight1600 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Soarer and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Soarer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…