DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Toyota Sequoia vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota SequoiaSpecificationMG ZT
ToyotaMakeMG
SequoiaModelZT
2009Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Toyota SequoiaSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
273 HPPower260 HP
440 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota SequoiaSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption17,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,4 lt
—Average consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota SequoiaSpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
275/65 R18; 275/55 R20Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota SequoiaSpecificationMG ZT
5210 mmLength4740 mm
2029 mmWidth1780 mm
1895 mmHeight1430 mm
2735 KgWeight1595 Kg
3099 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Toyota Sequoia and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…