DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Sequoia vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Sequoia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
SequoiaModelEconoline
2004Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
243 HPPower193 HP
427 NmTorque331 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
99 ltFuel tank132 lt
23 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
13 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5180 mmLength5382 mm
1980 mmWidth2014 mm
1860 mmHeight2050 mm
2300 KgWeight2370 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Sequoia and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Sequoia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…