DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Sequoia vs 2006 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Sequoia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.

77.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
SequoiaModelC30
2004Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,7 s
175 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
243 HPPower220 HP
427 NmTorque320 Nm
8Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
99 ltFuel tank62 lt
23 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
13,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5180 mmLength4252 mm
1980 mmWidth1782 mm
1860 mmHeight1447 mm
2300 KgWeight1437 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Sequoia and 2006 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Sequoia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…