DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 BMW X6 vs 2017 Acura RDX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X6SpecificationAcura RDX
BMWMakeAcura
X6ModelRDX
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
4/5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW X6SpecificationAcura RDX
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
222 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3471 cc
245 HPPower279 HP
540 NmTorque342 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X6SpecificationAcura RDX
DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X6SpecificationAcura RDX
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8 SteptronicGears6
255/50 R19 107V XLTyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X6SpecificationAcura RDX
4877 mmLength4685 mm
1983 mmWidth1872 mm
1690 mmHeight1651 mm
2075 KgWeight1695-1715 Kg
2933 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 BMW X6 and 2017 Acura RDX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…