DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Toyota Rush vs 2008 Hyundai Verna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Verna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeHyundai
RushModelVerna
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1495 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
141 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,85 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4045 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1705 mmHeight1470 mm
1150 KgWeight1140 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Toyota Rush and 2008 Hyundai Verna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Verna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…