2000 • Toyota
Regius
Toyota Regius 3.0 D (140 Hp) 2000Overall Score64.75/100
2000 Toyota Regius vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 3.0 V6 (167 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Citroen XM
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota RegiusSpecificationCitroen XM
ToyotaMakeCitroen
RegiusModelXM
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
8Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Toyota RegiusSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2982 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
140 HPPower167 HP
343 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota RegiusSpecificationCitroen XM
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota RegiusSpecificationCitroen XM
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota RegiusSpecificationCitroen XM
4750 mmLength4708 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1960 mmHeight1389 mm
—Weight1470 Kg
2985 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Regius and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…