DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Toyota RAV4 vs 2016 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
RAV4ModelTriton
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
155 HPPower110 HP
210 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank75 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4605 mmLength5200 mm
1845 mmWidth1785 mm
1675 mmHeight1655 mm
1690-1775 KgWeight1590 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Toyota RAV4 and 2016 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…