DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota RAV4 vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLand Rover
RAV4ModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
167 HPPower177 HP
224 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
215/70 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4433 mm
1735 mmWidth1809 mm
1680 mmHeight1709 mm
1350 KgWeight1550 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota RAV4 and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…