2017 • BMW
X6
BMW X6 M Plus 2017 xDrive40d 3.0 313 HPOverall Score88.75/100
2017 BMW X6 vs 2014 Wiesmann Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Wiesmann
Roadster
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V (325 Hp) 2014Overall Score88.5/100
WINNER
BMW X6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
88.75–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X6SpecificationWiesmann Roadster
BMWMakeWiesmann
X6ModelRoadster
2017Model year2014
SUVBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
BMW X6SpecificationWiesmann Roadster
5,8 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
240 km/hTop speed255 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3246 cc
313 HPPower325 HP
630 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X6SpecificationWiesmann Roadster
DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X6SpecificationWiesmann Roadster
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
SteptronicTransmission—
19Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X6SpecificationWiesmann Roadster
4909 mmLength3860 mm
1989 mmWidth1750 mm
1702 mmHeight1160 mm
2180 kgWeight1180 Kg
550 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2990 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 BMW X6 and 2014 Wiesmann Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW X6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…