DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota RAV4 vs 2012 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeLand Rover
RAV4ModelFreelander
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
177 HPPower150 HP
400 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4315-4395 mmLength4500 mm
1815 mmWidth—
1685-1720 mmHeight1740 mm
1595 KgWeight1710 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota RAV4 and 2012 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…