DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Toyota RAV4 vs 2013 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
RAV4ModelV60
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
152 HPPower150 HP
194 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank67 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4315-4395 mmLength4628 mm
1815 mmWidth1865 mm
1685-1720 mmHeight1484 mm
1465 KgWeight1537 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Toyota RAV4 and 2013 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…