2002 • Toyota
Raum
Toyota Raum 1.5 i 16V (94 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.25/100
2002 Toyota Raum vs 2002 Nissan Cube Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Nissan
Cube
Nissan Cube 1.5 (109Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cube
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota RaumSpecificationNissan Cube
ToyotaMakeNissan
RaumModelCube
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Toyota RaumSpecificationNissan Cube
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
94 HPPower109 HP
132 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota RaumSpecificationNissan Cube
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota RaumSpecificationNissan Cube
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
175/65 R14 STyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota RaumSpecificationNissan Cube
4045 mmLength3900 mm
1685 mmWidth1670 mm
1535 mmHeight1645 mm
1090 KgWeight1060 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Toyota Raum and 2002 Nissan Cube approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cube leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…