DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Toyota Raum vs 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
RaumModelLancer
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1468 cc
94 HPPower105 HP
132 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/65 R14 STyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4045 mmLength—
1685 mmWidth—
1535 mmHeight—
1090 KgWeight—
2520 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Toyota Raum and 2002 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…