2000 • Toyota
Raum
Toyota Raum 1.5 i 16V (94 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.25/100
2000 Toyota Raum vs 2000 Honda Civic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Honda
Civic
Honda Civic 1.5 16V (114 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Honda Civic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota RaumSpecificationHonda Civic
ToyotaMakeHonda
RaumModelCivic
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota RaumSpecificationHonda Civic
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
94 HPPower114 HP
132 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota RaumSpecificationHonda Civic
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota RaumSpecificationHonda Civic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
175/65 R14 STyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Toyota RaumSpecificationHonda Civic
4045 mmLength—
1685 mmWidth—
1535 mmHeight—
1090 KgWeight—
2520 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Raum and 2000 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…