2010 • Toyota
Ractis
Toyota Ractis 1.5i 16V (110 Hp) 2010Overall Score59.5/100
2010 Toyota Ractis vs 2010 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (115 Hp) 2010Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota RactisSpecificationMazda 3
ToyotaMakeMazda
RactisModel3
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota RactisSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
141 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota RactisSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota RactisSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota RactisSpecificationMazda 3
3995 mmLength4460 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1640 mmHeight1470 mm
1140 KgWeight1255 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Toyota Ractis and 2010 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…