DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Progres vs 1999 Cadillac Catera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac Catera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.25–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCadillac
ProgresModelCatera
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
180 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2962 cc
215 HPPower203 HP
294 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size225/55 HR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4930 mm
1700 mmWidth1790 mm
1435 mmHeight1430 mm
1520 KgWeight1710 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Progres and 1999 Cadillac Catera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac Catera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…