2012 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.5 i (109 Hp) 2012Overall Score59.5/100
2012 Toyota Probox vs 2012 Nissan Juke Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke 1.5 dCi (110 Hp) 2012Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Juke
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProboxSpecificationNissan Juke
ToyotaMakeNissan
ProboxModelJuke
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota ProboxSpecificationNissan Juke
—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
141 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ProboxSpecificationNissan Juke
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProboxSpecificationNissan Juke
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ProboxSpecificationNissan Juke
4195 mmLength4135 mm
1695 mmWidth1765 mm
1525 mmHeight1570 mm
1030 KgWeight1285 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2530 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Toyota Probox and 2012 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…