DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Toyota Probox vs 2011 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
ProboxModel3
2011Model year2011
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
141 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4580 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1525 mmHeight1470 mm
1030 KgWeight1240 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Toyota Probox and 2011 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…