DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Toyota Probox vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeVolvo
ProboxModelV50
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
141 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4514 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1525 mmHeight1452 mm
1030 KgWeight1340 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Toyota Probox and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…