2009 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.4 D (75 Hp) 2009Overall Score58.5/100
2009 Toyota Probox vs 2009 Chery Kimo (A1) Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
-2009-Teknik-Ozellikleri.jpg)
2009 • Chery
Kimo (A1)
Chery Kimo (A1) 1.3i (83 Hp) 2009Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Chery Kimo (A1)
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
ToyotaMakeChery
ProboxModelKimo (A1)
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1297 cc
75 HPPower83 HP
170 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/60 R14
Dimensions
Toyota ProboxSpecificationChery Kimo (A1)
4195 mmLength3700 mm
1695 mmWidth1578 mm
1525 mmHeight1527 mm
1030 KgWeight1070 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2390 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Toyota Probox and 2009 Chery Kimo (A1) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chery Kimo (A1) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSLada 2107 vs Toyota Probox2009 and 2009 model yearsVSChery Kimo (A1) vs Toyota Probox2009 and 2009 model yearsImage unavailableVSChery QQ6 (S21) vs Toyota Probox2009 and 2009 model years
VSLada 2113 vs Toyota Probox2009 and 2009 model years
VSGreat Wall Florid vs Toyota Probox2009 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…