2003 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.4 D (75 Hp) 2003Overall Score55.5/100
2003 Toyota Probox vs 2003 Toyota Cami Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Toyota
Cami
Toyota Cami 1.3i 16V P (90 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Cami
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProboxSpecificationToyota Cami
ToyotaMakeToyota
ProboxModelCami
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota ProboxSpecificationToyota Cami
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1297 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
170 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProboxSpecificationToyota Cami
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/70 R15 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ProboxSpecificationToyota Cami
4195 mmLength3785 mm
1695 mmWidth1555 mm
1525 mmHeight1695 mm
1030 KgWeight1050 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2420 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Probox and 2003 Toyota Cami approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Cami leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…