DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Toyota Proace vs 2016 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Proace

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAudi
ProaceModelA3
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5/6Seats4
4/5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
177 HPPower172 HP
400 NmTorque271 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
215/65 R16; 225/55 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4609 mmLength4421 mm
1920 mmWidth1793 mm
1905 mmHeight1409 mm
—Weight1530 Kg
2925 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Toyota Proace and 2016 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Proace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…