2015 • Toyota
Proace
Toyota Proace 1.6 D4-D (90 Hp) 2015Overall Score47.5/100
2015 Toyota Proace vs 2015 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Ti-VCT (85 Hp) 2015Overall Score48.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
47.5–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProaceSpecificationFord C-Max
ToyotaMakeFord
ProaceModelC-Max
2015Model year2015
MinivanBody typeMPV
3Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota ProaceSpecificationFord C-Max
16,5 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
145 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
90 HPPower85 HP
180 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ProaceSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank53 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProaceSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ProaceSpecificationFord C-Max
4813 mmLength4379 mm
1895 mmWidth1828 mm
1980 mmHeight1626 mm
1736-1848 KgWeight1374 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Toyota Proace and 2015 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…