2003 • BMW
X5
BMW X5 4.4i (286 Hp) 2003Overall Score83.75/100
2003 BMW X5 vs 2002 Jaguar XK 8 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Jaguar
XK 8
Jaguar XK 8 4.0 i V8 32V (284 Hp) 2002Overall Score84.5/100
WINNER
Jaguar XK 8
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X5SpecificationJaguar XK 8
BMWMakeJaguar
X5ModelXK 8
2003Model year2002
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
5Doors2
Performance
BMW X5SpecificationJaguar XK 8
7,5 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4398 ccEngine displacement3998 cc
286 HPPower284 HP
440 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X5SpecificationJaguar XK 8
PetrolFuel typePetrol
92 ltFuel tank75 lt
18,8 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
13,9 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X5SpecificationJaguar XK 8
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R18; 255/50 R19; 285/45 R19Tyre size245/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X5SpecificationJaguar XK 8
4666 mmLength4760 mm
1872 mmWidth1829 mm
1717 mmHeight1306 mm
2085 KgWeight1780 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2588 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 BMW X5 and 2002 Jaguar XK 8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar XK 8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…