2003 • BMW
X5
BMW X5 3.0d (184 Hp) 2003Overall Score72.75/100
2003 BMW X5 vs 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Land Rover
Range Rover Sport
Land Rover Range Rover Sport Range 2.7 Td (190 Hp) 2008Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW X5SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
BMWMakeLand Rover
X5ModelRange Rover Sport
2003Model year2008
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
BMW X5SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
10,1 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2720 cc
184 HPPower190 HP
410 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
BMW X5SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
DieselFuel typeDiesel
93 ltFuel tank82 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
BMW X5SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/65 R17Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW X5SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
4666 mmLength4790 mm
1872 mmWidth1930 mm
1717 mmHeight1785 mm
2170 KgWeight2385 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 BMW X5 and 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Land Rover Range Rover Sport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…