2003 • Toyota
Picnic
Toyota Picnic 2.0i (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
2003 Toyota Picnic vs 2003 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota PicnicSpecificationKia Retona
ToyotaMakeKia
PicnicModelRetona
2003Model year2003
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors3
Performance
Toyota PicnicSpecificationKia Retona
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
192 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota PicnicSpecificationKia Retona
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota PicnicSpecificationKia Retona
—Length4000 mm
—Width1745 mm
—Height1835 mm
—Weight1480 Kg
—Wheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Picnic and 2003 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableKia Optima vs Toyota Picnic2003 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Nadia vs Toyota Picnic2003 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Vista vs Toyota Picnic2003 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Prairie vs Toyota Picnic2003 and 2003 model years
VSImage unavailableDodge Neon vs Toyota Picnic2003 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…