2000 • Toyota
Picnic
Toyota Picnic 2.0 16V (SXM10) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
2000 Toyota Picnic vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Sharan
Volkswagen Sharan 1.9 TDI (110 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Picnic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota PicnicSpecificationVolkswagen Sharan
ToyotaMakeVolkswagen
PicnicModelSharan
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
6Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota PicnicSpecificationVolkswagen Sharan
10,8 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
180 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
128 HPPower110 HP
178 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota PicnicSpecificationVolkswagen Sharan
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota PicnicSpecificationVolkswagen Sharan
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota PicnicSpecificationVolkswagen Sharan
4530 mmLength4620 mm
1695 mmWidth1810 mm
1620 mmHeight1730 mm
1335 KgWeight1665 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Toyota Picnic and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Picnic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…