2003 • Toyota
Nadia
Toyota Nadia 2.0 i 16V (145 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
2003 Toyota Nadia vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 1.8 i 16V (160 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Nadia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota NadiaSpecificationMG ZR
ToyotaMakeMG
NadiaModelZR
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Toyota NadiaSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h7,8 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
145 HPPower160 HP
196 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota NadiaSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota NadiaSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota NadiaSpecificationMG ZR
4435 mmLength4011 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1625 mmHeight1400 mm
1370 KgWeight1090 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Nadia and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Nadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…