DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Nadia vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Nadia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAlfa Romeo
NadiaModel156
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
180 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1970 cc
145 HPPower155 HP
196 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
12 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4430 mm
1695 mmWidth1745 mm
1625 mmHeight1415 mm
1370 KgWeight1250 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Nadia and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Nadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…