DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Nadia vs 2000 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Nadia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeOpel
NadiaModelAstra
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower160 HP
196 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size215/40 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4110 mm
1695 mmWidth1709 mm
1625 mmHeight1405 mm
1370 KgWeight1135 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Nadia and 2000 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Nadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…